Comments on: No Mentionable Irregularities In Election-Asian Election Monitors http://www.jasminenews.com/archives/lankanews/sms-post-2599/14831 Breaking News To Your Mobile Phone Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:11:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Leanie meanie http://www.jasminenews.com/archives/lankanews/sms-post-2599/14831/comment-page-1#comment-47420 Leanie meanie Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:28 +0000 http://www.jasminenews.com/archives/lankanews/sms-post-2599/14831#comment-47420 Is interesting that the government website conveniently forgot to mention the word "mentionable" when they quoted this same election monitor head. Why is that the head uses the adjective "mentionable", saying there are no "mentionable" irregularities? Could it be that there are indeed great many events that stink of irregularities, but simply can't be proven, such as the counting agents being intimated and chased away as reported by CMEV and where the agents are afraid to give evidence? And since they can't be proven as yet, they are not "mentionable"? Is that what it means? Else why not simply say there were "no irregularities"? Is interesting that the government website conveniently forgot to mention the word “mentionable” when they quoted this same election monitor head.

Why is that the head uses the adjective “mentionable”, saying there are no “mentionable” irregularities? Could it be that there are indeed great many events that stink of irregularities, but simply can’t be proven, such as the counting agents being intimated and chased away as reported by CMEV and where the agents are afraid to give evidence? And since they can’t be proven as yet, they are not “mentionable”? Is that what it means? Else why not simply say there were “no irregularities”?

]]>